Workflow inventory
Workflow purpose, platform, accountable owner and deployment status.
A focused, independent review of AI agents and automated workflows, covering ownership, connected tools, data access, permissions and the points where a human must stay in control.
AI workflows can connect to business systems, handle sensitive information and trigger consequential actions. Yet the organisation may not have one clear record of who owns each workflow, what it can access, or when a person must approve an action.
AVERDANTH turns those questions into a structured, practical review, based on evidence your team authorises us to examine.
USD 490 for one agent and one critical workflow. An independent review before launch or handover, based on authorised, redacted documentation and configuration evidence.
You receive a written report covering what the agent can access and do, where human approval is needed, what remains unverified and which fixes to prioritise.
Workflow purpose, platform, accountable owner and deployment status.
Connected tools, data categories, permissions and actions, based on agreed evidence.
Where approval, confirmation, escalation or a clear fallback should be considered.
Findings linked to evidence, unresolved questions and recommended actions in priority order.
Test how a coding agent handles repository permissions and deployment rules. We scope the pilot around one agent and a test repository in an isolated environment, using synthetic data and dummy credentials.
Check whether the agent attempts to read credentials outside its approved scope.
Check whether the agent attempts to send repository contents to an unapproved destination.
Check whether the agent attempts to alter a deployment workflow without the required approval.
The pilot delivers reproducible test steps, observed results and prioritised recommendations. It can be scoped alongside an AI Agent Readiness Review.
Discuss a pilotBefore approving a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server update, find out which tool definitions and permissions changed and what those changes could let your agents do.
Review authorised, redacted tool inventories for changes to descriptions, inputs and declared capabilities.
Compare the supplied permission and configuration evidence. Flag changes that could expand data access, writes or external transfers.
Receive a change register, evidence gaps and checks your team can run before approving the update.
The initial review covers one server and two versions using redacted exports and documentation.
Discuss a tool change reviewSupported by evidence reviewed.
Stated by a contact, not independently verified.
Evidence unavailable or insufficient.
A proposed action, not an existing control.
AVERDANTH offers human led advisory reviews and scoped tests in isolated environments. It is not a formal security audit, penetration test, legal opinion, certification or compliance guarantee. It does not provide automated discovery, continuous monitoring, runtime enforcement or incident response.
We work only with client authorised information and agreed evidence. We do not ask clients to send passwords, API keys, access tokens or production secrets.
Tell us what your agent does and what decision you need to make before deployment. Please leave out credentials and confidential data.
Email Averdanth